Thursday, May 7, 2009
The Test Today
I kept emphasizing on my accounting blog, to know your financial statements, and how to fill it out:
1. Balance Sheet
2. Income Statement (sorry I'm a little old school and US centric on this one)
3. Cash Flow Statement
4. Operations Statement
Some points of the test!!!
A) Know what principles/theories, etc and the advantages and disadvantages
B) Calculation of ratios (PE, turnover, etc)
C) Compare 2 businesses and do all the formulas and advise which one is the better buy.
Bank Reconciliation
If you know how to do these at least halfway decently you should be able to pass.
If you don't know anything, at least memorize all the principles/theories and know how to fill out a Balance Sheet, Income Statement and know how to do a bank reconciliation.
If you don't know how to do those by now, you're in big trouble.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
A/R Analysis
Accounts Receivable Analysis (How credit is managed)
- A/R Turnover
- Number of Days Sales in A/R
- Estimate number of days of A/R to Cash
2009 |
2008 | |
Accounts Receivable, end of year | $222,466 | $235,068 |
Monthly Average Accounts Receivable (net) | 207,143 | 216,667 |
Net Sales | 1,450,000 | 1,300,000 |
Terms of sales are 1/10 (1% discount, if paid within 10 days), and n/60 (net 60, net due within 60 days)
a) Determine for each year (1) The accounts receivable turnover and (2) the number of days sales in receivables.
b) What conclusions can be drawn from these data concerning accounts receivables and credit policies?
First: Accounts Receivable Turnover Formula
Net Sales divided by Average A/R
2009 | 2008 | |
Net Sales | 1,450,000 | 1,300,000 |
Div by Avg A/R | 207,143 | 216,667 |
Total | 7 | 6 |
That means the ratio of how much the A/R turnovers is 7 times a year
Second: Number of Days Sales in A/R
Accounts Receivable @ the End of the Year divided by Average Daily sales
2009 | 2008 | |
A/R @ EOY | 207,143 | 216,667 |
Div by Avg Daily A/R | (1,450,000/365) = 3,973 | (1,300,000/365) = 3,562 |
Total | 56 days | 66 days |
Current Position Analysis
Solvency Ratios:
Current Position Analysis
1. Working capital
Formula = current asset – current liabilities
2. Current Ratio – Let's you know how many times current assets can cover current liabilities
Current Assets/Current Liabilities (current assets divided by current liabilities)
3. Acid Test Ratio aka Quick Test (to show how quickly a business can fulfill its obligations, simply put how quickly they can pay off debt if they had to)
Quick Assets/Current liabilities (quick assets – cash/securities, etc divided by current liabilities.
Current Year |
Preceding Year | |
Cash | $280,000 | $265,000 |
Marketable Securities | 131,000 | 121,000 |
Accounts & Notes Rec (net) | 395,000 | 384,000 |
Inventories | 570,000 | 555,000 |
Prepaid Expenses | 19,000 | 40,000 |
Account & Notes Payable (net) | 250,000 | 285,700 |
Accrued Liabilities | 60,000 | 64,300 |
Current Assets in blue
Current Liabilities in green
a) determine for each year (1) the working capital (2) the current ratio & (3) the acid-test ratio.
b) What conclusions can be drawn from these data as to the company's ability to meet its currently maturing debts?
Let's do this: For the sake of simplicity, let's use 2009 & 2008
1. Working capital
2009 | 2008 | |
Assets | $1,395,000 | $1,365,000 |
Liab | -310,000 | -350,000 |
Total | $1,085,000 | $1,015,000 |
2. Current Ratio
2009 | 2008 | |
Assets | $1,395,000 | $1,365,000 |
Liab | Divide by 310,000 | Divide by 350,000 |
Total | 4.5 | 3.9 |
This means in 2009, current obligations can bet met 4.5 times compared to 3.9 times in the preceding year.
3. Acid Test
Quick Assets = Cash, Marketable Securities, Receivables divided by current liabilities
2009 | 2008 | |
Quick Assets | $806,000 | $770,000 |
Liab | Divided by 310,000 | Divided by 350,000 |
Total | 2.6 | 2.2 |
This means that 2008 the quick assets could cover the liabilities 2.2 times and in 2009, it improved to 2.6